This questioning seems to relate to the two rates of transportation to interact in prostitution that Combs is dealing with.
In line with an audio file of the conversation, alleged target "Jane", who was looking at Combs at this stage, told him just after getting out about the lawsuit: "That is so phrase for word, it's outrageous and it just feels Ill to my abdomen";
Jury dismissed with the working day Judge Arun Subramanian has now finished today's court docket session and dismissed the jury.
Through testimony from a paralegal specialist, messages evidently concerning "freak offs" have been introduced in court;
The juror has “vertigo indicators,” the decide explained. “I don’t Consider there’s any way for us to progress now.”
Ex-assistant Jonathan Perez finished from the fifth week just after Combs’s ex-girlfriend ‘Jane’ continued testifying less than a pseudonym, addressing “freak-offs,” a “enjoy contract” plus more. The fourth week’s testimony included drug-fueled freak-offs described in graphic detail, testimony of a $one hundred,000 bribe and also the judge’s menace to kick Combs out from the proceedings.
Cassie Ventura: Months once the singer’s 2023 lawsuit was settled, disturbing footage from 2016 emerged that showed Combs viciously assaulting Ventura at a lodge. Combs apologized to the assault observed inside the video, which prompted Ventura to launch an announcement about domestic violence.
If examining a chart of data feels like dry testimony, it truly is. And it’s created all the more so because of the restrictions in how the prosecution can explain the chart, requiring them to be pretty methodical and neutral during the presentation of those documents.
This came following it emerged the juror, a black male, experienced presented inconsistent answers about wherever he lives;
Before the recess, Choose Arun Subramanian sided Together with the defense, which sought to Restrict how Exclusive agent DeLeassa Penland talks with regards to the summary chart. Due to the fact Penland wasn’t at these meetings — which the prosecution is suggesting ended up freak-offs — she can’t make any inferences in her testimony about just what the parties did. She’s minimal largely to reading out the different paperwork, which are grouped by date.
Soon after this, the prosecution known as two summary witnesses - witnesses who weren't involved in the investigation into Combs but check here are in courtroom to summarise textual content conversations and various knowledge, and supply context to earlier proof and how it pertains to the charges;
Live updates have ended, but keep reading for anything that transpired during the Diddy demo on Tuesday
The fate of A further juror, who was discussed At first of the hearing more than issues he might have spoken improperly with regard to the circumstance that has a previous colleague, was left unresolved at the end of modern session - this concern could possibly be resolved through the judge tomorrow.
Khorram is a significant A part of The federal government’s racketeering case versus Combs — she is one of the individuals prosecutors have painted to be a participant during the “Combs organization,” which, they contend, conspired to protect Combs’s standing and cover up his alleged crimes.
Together with the 1st entry, Assistant U.S. Lawyer Emily Johnson highlighted a text Trade in between Combs and Jules from close to that time that appeared to indicate them Functioning out their schedules for one of these “meetings.”